Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:43:19
Message-Id: 42EA5BC6.2070505@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die by Carsten Lohrke
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Carsten Lohrke wrote:
5 | On Friday 29 July 2005 17:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
6 |
7 |>This can be read as "it's good to use epatch" ? :P
8 |
9 |
10 | It's just less text to write PATCHES="foo ...", if you don't have a
11 src_unpack
12 | function in the particular ebuild.
13
14 That doesn't really make any sense. You could just as easily use PATCHES
15 if you ran s/patch -p0 </epatch/.
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iD8DBQFC6lvGXVaO67S1rtsRAlsiAKDKwmY+Bhnyev3/nFPUVMjswn7nowCgvqoS
20 9cycCCpng0ZFDqioTkhkw1g=
21 =vHNY
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o>