Archives
Archives
| From: | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | ||
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:06:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200507291902.27179.carlo@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die by Donnie Berkholz |
||
| 1 | On Friday 29 July 2005 18:39, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 | > That doesn't really make any sense. You could just as easily use PATCHES |
| 3 | > if you ran s/patch -p0 </epatch/. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Don't get what you want to say... I read Diego's comment as an ironic one, |
| 6 | that there's no need for the PATCHES variable, which is of course true, but |
| 7 | you don't have to write "src_unpack(){ foo_unpack ; epatch some_patch }" just |
| 8 | for a single patch. I'm a bit surprised by such a comment on this triviality. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | carsten |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> |