| 1 |
On Friday 29 July 2005 19:02, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> Don't get what you want to say... I read Diego's comment as an ironic one, |
| 3 |
> that there's no need for the PATCHES variable, which is of course true, but |
| 4 |
> you don't have to write "src_unpack(){ foo_unpack ; epatch some_patch }" |
| 5 |
> just for a single patch. I'm a bit surprised by such a comment on this |
| 6 |
> triviality. |
| 7 |
No I wasn't saying that it's useless to use PATCHES.. actually, if this is |
| 8 |
going to be fixed (the failure stuff) I think I'll start using it more. |
| 9 |
What I was saying was that Mike's comment could have been read as "just move |
| 10 |
to epatch, if something breaks (like packages dying as the patch fails to |
| 11 |
apply) it was broken QA-wise before. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
No irony, really. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 17 |
Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
| 18 |
(Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) |
Archives