| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 5 |
| On Friday 29 July 2005 18:39, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
|>That doesn't really make any sense. You could just as easily use PATCHES |
| 8 |
|>if you ran s/patch -p0 </epatch/. |
| 9 |
| |
| 10 |
| |
| 11 |
| Don't get what you want to say... I read Diego's comment as an ironic |
| 12 |
one, |
| 13 |
| that there's no need for the PATCHES variable, which is of course |
| 14 |
true, but |
| 15 |
| you don't have to write "src_unpack(){ foo_unpack ; epatch some_patch |
| 16 |
}" just |
| 17 |
| for a single patch. I'm a bit surprised by such a comment on this |
| 18 |
triviality. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I just don't see how his comment had anything to do with PATCHES. It was |
| 21 |
simply replacing a direct call to patch with epatch. Thus, your comment |
| 22 |
doesn't make any sense to me, either. |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iD8DBQFC6mKyXVaO67S1rtsRAgE5AJ9uuuMqXeF1vgZQINLCiQD0F61//gCfdO3F |
| 27 |
UZPy3sZiCl9TMP2Bh3WRkmI= |
| 28 |
=Iu2D |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives