| 1 |
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 16:59, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey man.. :-) |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I hope you didn't misinterpret the last mail as any sort of attack on or |
| 5 |
> towards you. The RE: to you was just as good as anybody in my minds eye. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I didn't think that was an attack at all. I was trying to be a little |
| 8 |
humorous, since I was pretty much for the removal all along and you went |
| 9 |
into this pretty long, but quite informative spiel on the evils of |
| 10 |
USE=acl. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Glad your able to save a few cpu cycles and QA becomes much cleaner and |
| 13 |
> simpler for/by default. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Definitely. In fact, I had tried to remove the acl/attr packages at one |
| 16 |
point and it broke things like "ls", so needless to say I was a bit |
| 17 |
miffed. My current stance on the LiveCD is any byte saved is one less |
| 18 |
byte wasted on the mirrors. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> -peace |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ditto... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 26 |
Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager |
| 27 |
Games - Developer |
| 28 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives