Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:45:05
Message-Id: 20080401114451.0c82c080@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename by Brian Harring
1 On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:29:10 -0700
2 Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > Going to reiterate this one more time; the proposal is simple enough;
4 > if it's an implicit 0 via cpv parsing, it should *not* be explicitly
5 > specified on disk. 'diffball-1.0_alpha0.ebuild' can just as easily
6 > be specified as 'diffball-1.0_alpha.ebuild', 'diffball-1.0-r0.ebuild'
7 > can just as easily be specified as 'diffball-1.0.ebuild'.
8 >
9 > Reiterating the gain: consistancy on disk, consistancy in dealing
10 > with PV/PVR.
11
12 Consistency with what? Having _alpha on disk and in PV is just as
13 consistent...
14
15 --
16 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature