| 1 |
Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, |
| 5 |
>>> and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. |
| 6 |
>> AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> |
| 7 |
>> rsync script will ensure that the incorrectly named new item is |
| 8 |
>> deleted on the rsync side after it's removed from cvs. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> As a lowly user, I would rather see it twice than to not see it at all. |
| 11 |
> Although the argument could be made that java is not a critical package. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Dale |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> :-) :-) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The news items have filters so they don't show to everyone. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Petteri |
Archives