| 1 |
Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, |
| 4 |
> > and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs -> |
| 7 |
> rsync script will ensure that the incorrectly named new item is |
| 8 |
> deleted on the rsync side after it's removed from cvs. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
As a lowly user, I would rather see it twice than to not see it at all. |
| 11 |
Although the argument could be made that java is not a critical package. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Dale |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
:-) :-) |
Archives