1 |
El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:21 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
2 |
> El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
3 |
> > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 22:02 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
4 |
> > > On 03/09/2012 09:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
5 |
> > > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: |
6 |
> > > >> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100 |
7 |
> > > >> Pacho Ramos<pacho@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> > > >> |
9 |
> > > >>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
10 |
> > > >>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
11 |
> > > >>>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
12 |
> > > >>>>>> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like |
13 |
> > > >>>>>> herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think |
14 |
> > > >>>>>> we should drop that herds and move their packages to |
15 |
> > > >>>>>> maintainer-needed in a week or so. |
16 |
> > > >>>>>> |
17 |
> > > >>>>>> What do you think? |
18 |
> > > >>>>>> |
19 |
> > > >>>>> |
20 |
> > > >>>>> The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( |
21 |
> > > >>>> |
22 |
> > > >>>> and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now |
23 |
> > > >>> |
24 |
> > > >>> Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: |
25 |
> > > >>> - Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and |
26 |
> > > >>> reflect reality) |
27 |
> > > >>> - Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports |
28 |
> > > >>> |
29 |
> > > >>> The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages |
30 |
> > > >>> to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want |
31 |
> > > >> |
32 |
> > > >> For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, |
33 |
> > > >> removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping |
34 |
> > > >> the herd. |
35 |
> > > >> |
36 |
> > > > |
37 |
> > > > OK but, what about the rest? ;) |
38 |
> > > |
39 |
> > > Please leave at least media-optical@ be as it is. Changing it doesn't |
40 |
> > > make any sense. |
41 |
> > > |
42 |
> > > |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > Well, the idea would be to get their bugs assigned to maintainer-needed |
45 |
> > and media-optical CCed if somebody wants to take that stuff someday, it |
46 |
> > would reflect better reality as, currently, their bugs are being |
47 |
> > assigned to an empty herd (yes, xarthisius (I think he was in alias but |
48 |
> > not officially in herd last time I checked, anyway it's only one |
49 |
> > example, nothing personal against him of course :)). What will occur |
50 |
> > when he simply drops his mail from alias as he never wanted to be a |
51 |
> > member of that herd? What would occur if he only wants to maintain some |
52 |
> > packages but others are getting ignored? |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> > The idea to get them moved to "orphan" is to reflect reality and, that |
55 |
> > way, try to get developers (or users willing to proxy maintain them) |
56 |
> > involved on exact apps they really want to keep maintained. |
57 |
> |
58 |
> As talked just now with Samuli, he added him to media-optical (both, to |
59 |
> alias and herds.xml) and then, this no longer applies to media-optical |
60 |
> obviously ;) |
61 |
> |
62 |
|
63 |
Will then do the following: |
64 |
- Add a <maintainer> tag to their metadatas to get bugs assigned to |
65 |
maintainer-needed |
66 |
- Keep herd to get it CCed (like was done some weeks ago with openoffice |
67 |
herd) |
68 |
|
69 |
This applies to "sgml" and "text-markup" since media-optical is active |
70 |
again and looks like net-zope packages will go away soon |