Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ion license
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:48:52
Message-Id: 20070513094249.6bca4fb3@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ion license by Matti Bickel
1 On Sun, 13 May 2007 10:34:42 +0200
2 Matti Bickel <mabi@g.o> wrote:
3 > > If he doesn't want to hinder distributions, get him to fix his
4 > > licence. The way it is now makes it impossible for distributions to
5 > > do their job.
6 >
7 > We all agree it's retarded. However, i can't change the way it is.
8
9 Well, you can drop support from the tree... I suspect upstream might
10 change their tune if distributions stick their collective feet down.
11
12 > > > In general: i don't think forking is an option. I won't be
13 > > > maintaining a fork myself to begin with.
14 > >
15 > > Probably true, from a Gentoo perspective. If there's a significant
16 > > ion userbase, someone else will do the work.
17 >
18 > There's already someone doing the work for gentoo. Look at bug
19 > #136077, which is, tbh, one of my main motivators to work on that
20 > package. I just feel that letting (contributing) users down would be
21 > kind of a shame.
22
23 Move it to an overlay. People have far lower expectations from
24 overlays...
25
26 --
27 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature