| 1 |
On 10/22/07, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 22 October 2007 06:04:58 Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 01:42 Mon 22 Oct , Alexander Gabert wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > this is a request for comments on a new project: |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/extreme-security/ |
| 7 |
> This sounds interesting, though the project page is not very specific. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > I'm curious whether this would be better-placed as a subproject of |
| 10 |
> > either the security or hardened projects. Why do you think it would be |
| 11 |
> > better off independent? |
| 12 |
> The Security Team as it stands now is mostly reactive and not proactive so I |
| 13 |
> don't think it would fit very well as a sub project of security. Hardened is |
| 14 |
> another matter. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> -- |
| 17 |
> Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz) |
| 18 |
> Gentoo Linux Security Team |
| 19 |
> http://security.gentoo.org |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I live the way you put 'friendly' first :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
regarding the past posts about the existing security team, I'm |
| 28 |
thinking this project is suposed to build up some suite of |
| 29 |
applications and configurations to let the administrator control his |
| 30 |
security settings in a more easy way. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
imo this does not clash with the security team's purpose; this project |
| 33 |
will that the security team's results and make it into a more frieldy |
| 34 |
suite |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
I'd be more than happy to assist in this project, or the main security team. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Thanks, |
| 40 |
Omer Cohen |
| 41 |
www.omerc.net |
| 42 |
omerc.net@×××××.com |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives