Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Luis F. Araujo" <araujo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler...
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 03:33:59
Message-Id: 43B9EFBD.1060906@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler... by "Spider (DmD Lj)"
1 Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
2
3 >On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 10:35 +0100, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >>After my last sync, I have this new block between evince and xpdf, which
7 >>is a problem at least to me.
8 >>
9 >>Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same
10 >>system?
11 >>
12 >>
13 >
14 >
15 >Yeah. : )
16 >
17 >See, poppler blocks against -older- versions of xpdf, not against
18 >"current" ones, so start by removing xpdf, upgrading poppler, then
19 >re-install xpdf and you should be fine.
20 >
21 >//Spider
22 >
23 >
24 It shouldn't be needed to remove the old xpdf version before
25 updating/installing
26 poppler.
27
28 !<app-text/xpdf-3.01-r4 is on app-text/poppler , and i get a blocking error
29 with it.
30
31 Calculating dependencies ...done!
32 [blocks B ] <app-text/xpdf-3.01-r4 (is blocking
33 app-text/poppler-0.4.3-r1)
34 [ebuild N ] app-text/poppler-0.4.3-r1
35
36 Now if i change to >=app-text/xpdf-3.01-r4 , it works just fine.
37
38 Calculating dependencies ...done!
39 [ebuild U ] app-text/xpdf-3.01-r4 [3.01-r3]
40 [ebuild N ] app-text/poppler-0.4.3-r1
41
42 I am not sure what it is happening here though... is the !< notation broken?
43
44 I also think we should stick to the >= notation instead, which it is
45 cleaner imho.
46
47
48 --
49 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler... "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>