| 1 |
Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 5/17/06, Christian Hartmann <ian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> > With respect to the "hey support omg!" comments i say stick a big fat |
| 4 |
>> > README about being an experimental profile or something like that and |
| 5 |
>> > that's it. Usually bug reports require "emerge --info" so it'll be easy |
| 6 |
>> > to flag invalid ones anyway. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Well. Marking a bug invalid doesn't make the real problem go away... |
| 9 |
>> but the |
| 10 |
>> users. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'd say that's exactly the intention of INVALID. If I were to file, |
| 13 |
> say, a bug in GCC at Gentoo's Bugzilla instead of GCC's, it would be |
| 14 |
> marked INVALID. (Unless, of course, the bug is caused by Gentoo's |
| 15 |
> patches.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Actually it should be marked UPSTREAM. But we're getting a bit offtopic |
| 18 |
here. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
Donnie |
Archives