| 1 |
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:02:44 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 15 July 2004 08:17, Spider wrote: |
| 3 |
> > begin quote |
| 4 |
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:56:02 -0700 |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, |
| 8 |
> > > version=0.92.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 |
| 9 |
> > > (2004-01-11) on Darkmere.darkmere |
| 10 |
> > > X-Spam-Level: |
| 11 |
> > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 |
| 12 |
> > > tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MORTGAGE_BEST, |
| 13 |
> > > MORTGAGE_PITCH,MORTGAGE_RATES,WEIRD_PORT autolearn=no |
| 14 |
> > > version=2.63 |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Hmm. Spam? I see no spam. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Well, I never got the message until I searched for the subject in my |
| 19 |
> spam folder. I recieve enough spams each day that I don't check all my |
| 20 |
> spam emails on their being ham. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't understand why you guys check emails that have a "List-Id: |
| 23 |
Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>" field in the header wether |
| 24 |
they are spam or not. You need to subscribe to this list to post, hence |
| 25 |
no spam from the list. Waste of system resources if you still check. |
| 26 |
Same for the other gentoo ml's. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives