Archives
Archives
| From: | Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gnupg2 only vs gnupg-1 & gnupg-2 | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 May 2007 20:05:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 871wh2ox0q.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gnupg2 only vs gnupg-1 & gnupg-2 by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I would also strongly favor if both gnupg-1 and gnupg-2 could be kept |
| 4 | > in different slots. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | And maybe an eselect (or similar) to select whether external programs |
| 7 | which call use gpg-1 or gpg-2. |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] gnupg2 only vs gnupg-1 & gnupg-2 | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> |