| 1 |
On 31 March 2013 15:32, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 31/03/13 17:14, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Hello |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Looks like this herd has some unattended bug for a long time (some for |
| 7 |
>> some years), and looks not quite active. Is it still active? Should it |
| 8 |
>> be dropped in favor of dedicated maintainers for its packages? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Thanks |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I've just added myself back to net-p2p@ but haven't had time to work on many |
| 14 |
> bugs yet |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> But no comment, if the herd gets deleted, then it gets deleted, i'm neutral |
| 17 |
> about that, can't speak for others |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> - Samuli |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The herd currently maintains 58[1] packages and a number of them are |
| 23 |
being co-maintained by other people. |
| 24 |
I don't think the herd is active and my opinion is to move |
| 25 |
high-profile packages, such as deluge, qbittorrent, rb_littorrent and |
| 26 |
packages co-maintained by others away from this herd. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
[1] |
| 29 |
hwoarang@helix ~ $ portageq --herd=net-p2p -n | wc -l |
| 30 |
58 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Regards, |
| 34 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 35 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives