| 1 |
On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 10:28:59 -0500 |
| 2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Markos, to answer your question, there are folks on the team, and at |
| 5 |
> least one user, using OpenRc from git without issues, so as far as I |
| 6 |
> know there shouldn't be any breakage. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
A few team developers is not a large enough test base for an important |
| 9 |
package that is to be installed and ran on _hundreds to thousands_ of |
| 10 |
user systems; I think you could reword future warnings to invite people |
| 11 |
to unmask and test this important package version bump, and then state |
| 12 |
it will be unmasked in X days if nothing bad gets reported. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
You might get away this time, but what if hell breaks loose next time? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Besides that, as stated by others, such announcements are appreciated. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thank you for the heads-up! |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> I guess I was a little more harsh than I should have been, because I |
| 21 |
> know there are users out here who want ~arch to be rock solid, and I |
| 22 |
> have caught flack before from some of that crowd. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Exactly, ~arch isn't the new stable; it isn't the new masked either. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
With kind regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 30 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 33 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 34 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives