| 1 |
On 01/02/17 09:43 AM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:18:42PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> W dniu 30.01.2017, pon o godzinie 14∶04 -0600, użytkownik William Hubbs |
| 4 |
>> napisał: |
| 5 |
>>> All, |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like |
| 8 |
>>> what I |
| 9 |
>>> see. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to the |
| 12 |
>>> meson build system [3]. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja |
| 15 |
>>> as |
| 16 |
>>> build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system where |
| 17 |
>>> we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or portability) |
| 18 |
>>> outweighs that. |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> What do folks think here? |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> On behalf of systemd team, I would like to officially contradict any |
| 23 |
>> rumors that those ideas are in any way caused by systemd team. OpenRC |
| 24 |
>> developers are shooting their own feet of their own choice. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I don't even know what this is about. I have said nothing about systemd |
| 27 |
> or any other package like that. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Pre-emptive strike is all. We all know systemd gets blamed for |
| 31 |
everything. :D |
Archives