Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Austin English <wizardedit@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving OpenRC to a meson-based build
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:11:00
Message-Id: 59647773-b7f3-072b-8d15-3449a1b7fed8@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving OpenRC to a meson-based build by Ian Stakenvicius
1 On 02/01/2017 08:53 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
2 > On 01/02/17 09:43 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
3 >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 01:18:42PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
4 >>> W dniu 30.01.2017, pon o godzinie 14∶04 -0600, użytkownik William Hubbs
5 >>> napisał:
6 >>>> All,
7 >>>>
8 >>>> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like
9 >>>> what I
10 >>>> see.
11 >>>>
12 >>>> I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to the
13 >>>> meson build system [3].
14 >>>>
15 >>>> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja
16 >>>> as
17 >>>> build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system where
18 >>>> we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or portability)
19 >>>> outweighs that.
20 >>>>
21 >>>> What do folks think here?
22 >>>
23 >>> On behalf of systemd team, I would like to officially contradict any
24 >>> rumors that those ideas are in any way caused by systemd team. OpenRC
25 >>> developers are shooting their own feet of their own choice.
26 >>
27 >> I don't even know what this is about. I have said nothing about systemd
28 >> or any other package like that.
29 >>
30 >
31 > Pre-emptive strike is all. We all know systemd gets blamed for
32 > everything. :D
33
34 My bathtub drains too fast, making it hard to take a bath instead of a
35 shower.
36
37 Freaking systemd.. ;)
38
39 --
40 -Austin
41
42 Austin English
43 Gentoo Developer
44 GPG: 00B3 2957 B94B F3E1

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature