| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> But even if that's the case (I wouldn't know), it's the case due to a |
| 4 |
> deliberate decision of those going "under the bus", because portage is |
| 5 |
> the default, and by choosing to use some other PM, they've deliberately |
| 6 |
> chosen its (non-PMS) features over those of portage. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
None of this really has anything to do with PMS as far as I can tell. |
| 10 |
There is no PMS requirement for --changed-use and such. There |
| 11 |
certainly might be a usability requirement for it, which is why it |
| 12 |
usually exists in one way or another. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Rich |
Archives