Archives
Archives
| From: | Martin Vaeth <vaeth@××××××××××××××××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:12:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | slrnladj5v.2li.vaeth@lounge.imp.fu-berlin.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? by Tom Wijsman |
||
| 1 | Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > It is surprising that there are only ~400 packages that have multiple |
| 4 | > slots available in the Portage tree; trying to reproduce this |
| 5 | |
| 6 | No need to write a script for such things |
| 7 | (export EIX_LIMIT_COMPACT=0 if you do not pipe the output): |
| 8 | eix -c2 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Packages with a slot different from "0" are found with eix -1, |
| 11 | i.e. the following lists packages for which a "0" default |
| 12 | would not lead to the desired result (because the only |
| 13 | provided slot is not "0"): |
| 14 | eix -c1 --and --not -2 |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Almost 1000 packages! |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |