Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:22:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_n8uO63LBhimGu1j6Jmx21dnYbF0brVTaFeJDMV_Q-K+w@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item by Pacho Ramos |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Does it apply to /dev/shm? That is the line I have in my fstab: |
| 3 | > shm /dev/shm tmpfs |
| 4 | > nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 |
| 5 | |
| 6 | No. It applies ONLY to /dev - if you even have a /dev line, and if |
| 7 | you don't that is OK. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |