Archives
Archives
| From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:05:20 |
| Message-Id: | 1359140709.2927.8.camel@belkin4 |
| 1 | I got today the udev news item and found: |
| 2 | - "The need of CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y in the kernel; need to verify the |
| 3 | fstype for possible /dev line in /etc/fstab is devtmpfs (and not, for |
| 4 | example, tmpfs)" |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Does it apply to /dev/shm? That is the line I have in my fstab: |
| 7 | shm /dev/shm tmpfs |
| 8 | nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Thanks |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Confusing tmpfs information in udev news item | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |