Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "C. Brewer" <cbrewer@×××××××××××××.net> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RE:Boot floppies | ||
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:40:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1059226798.24874.16.camel@vertigo | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] RE:Boot floppies by "C. Brewer" |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 05:16, C. Brewer wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > So if this was the case, why a 2.6 kernel? You could do it with a 2.2 or 2.4 |
| 4 | > oldschool style, |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Hardware support. Though I think one could get away easily with a 2.4 |
| 7 | kernel. I see no reason creating an "official" bootdisk with a beta |
| 8 | kernel. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Chris Gianelloni |
| 12 | Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RE:Boot floppies | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |