| 1 |
Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> Ryan Phillips wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >The council should not vote on gleps are provide policy. They should |
| 6 |
> >be there to handle the money and world-wide problems. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >The developers should drive innovation; not the council. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> >As in all democracies things get done slowly. We don't need a |
| 11 |
> >democracy within Gentoo, just a clear way of creating progress. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> Just because we have some elections in our process don't make Gentoo a |
| 16 |
> democracy. |
| 17 |
> Since we don't have a leader to make the important decisions, we need |
| 18 |
> some other form of authority to do the job. A council is the best |
| 19 |
> solution to the decisional problem. |
| 20 |
> Obviously it has nothing to do with innovation. As always, this is the |
| 21 |
> realm of developers. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> In the rest, I basically agree with avenj. No point in repeating what |
| 24 |
> Jon already said... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I disagree. The developers should make *all* the decisions. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Bypass the council. The council should be there only for when we get |
| 29 |
sued, and manage the money we make. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Does anyone agree that having a council is too political? I strongly |
| 32 |
believe it stifles gentoo. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-Ryan |
Archives