1 |
Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 16:30:43 |
2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 09/05/14 16:08, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 12:34:11 |
6 |
> > William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> napisał(a): |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the |
9 |
> >> system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has |
10 |
> >> become just adding iproute2. |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> If no one objects, I would like to do this sometime in the next 72 |
13 |
> >> hours by adding sys-apps/iproute2 to profiles/default/linux/packages. |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> >> Thoughts? |
16 |
> > I object. We should be keeping towards making @system as small |
17 |
> > as possible, not adding random packages there just because someone |
18 |
> > happens to use them often. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I don't like to say no when people want something, but I think here I'm |
22 |
> with Michal. My idea of @system is that it must be the bare minimum to |
23 |
> have a "working" system. And for a working system you need just enough |
24 |
> toolchain, networking and python to be able to bootstrap into whatever |
25 |
> you want to build from that point. We already have net-tools, so |
26 |
> iproute2 is not needed. |
27 |
|
28 |
Even better, @system is basically stuff you don't want to depend |
29 |
explicitly on or on which it is hard to depend on. As I see it, it |
30 |
should be just the most basic stuff, like baselayout, shell, some basic |
31 |
POSIX-defined utilities, some random stuff that PMS enforces, a C & C++ |
32 |
compiler. |
33 |
|
34 |
As I see it, @system is already overburdened with random packages that |
35 |
don't belong there. If we really feel like having to have something |
36 |
else installed by default, why not just put it in default @world? |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Best regards, |
40 |
Michał Górny |