| 1 |
110815 Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/15/11 21:55, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Considering the number of different virtuals in this category, |
| 4 |
>> maybe it would be a good idea to split it a little? |
| 5 |
>> -- maybe creating some kind of '*-virtual' categories. |
| 6 |
>> For example, half of the current virtuals are prefixed with 'perl-'. |
| 7 |
>> Maybe they could be transformed into 'perl-virtual/*'? |
| 8 |
> right now all virtuals are easily recognizable |
| 9 |
> and nicely grouped into one category. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If you're going to take that route, which mb a small improvement, |
| 12 |
it sb 'virtual-perl', 'virtual-java' etc. |
| 13 |
It would help users see more clearly what sundry virtuals are for: |
| 14 |
the present size of the category is less important than clarity. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
========================,,============================================ |
| 18 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
| 19 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
| 20 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |
Archives