1 |
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 14 September 2015 at 20:22, konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> If we use an arithmetic operator like ~> then that could be decided |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> As a counter proposal I'd suggest a different suffix character than |
7 |
>> "*" instead. It just seems less confusing to have something like |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> =cat/foo-1.30+ |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Instead of |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> ~>cat/foo-1.30 |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Because ~> to me conveys some combination of ~ and > effects, when it |
16 |
>> is neither of those two. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I thought ~> is good as it's already famous to fellow Ruby users but I |
19 |
> don't mind. =cat/foo-1.30+ seems good as well. |
20 |
|
21 |
@cat/foo-1.30 is also another. It only uses one symbol doesn't look |
22 |
bad if negated: !@cat/foo-1.30 |