1 |
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 14 September 2015 at 20:22, konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> If we use an arithmetic operator like ~> then that could be decided |
4 |
> |
5 |
> As a counter proposal I'd suggest a different suffix character than |
6 |
> "*" instead. It just seems less confusing to have something like |
7 |
> |
8 |
> =cat/foo-1.30+ |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Instead of |
11 |
> |
12 |
> ~>cat/foo-1.30 |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Because ~> to me conveys some combination of ~ and > effects, when it |
15 |
> is neither of those two. |
16 |
|
17 |
I thought ~> is good as it's already famous to fellow Ruby users but I |
18 |
don't mind. =cat/foo-1.30+ seems good as well. |