1 |
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 11:41, Leon Brocard wrote: |
2 |
> Michael Cummings sent the following bits through the ether: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I'd recommend only maintaining those perl modules that actually are |
5 |
> > depended on, and even then discouraging the use of ebuilds for |
6 |
> > loading perl modules |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Right. There's the problem of thousands of out-of-date ebuilds. I |
9 |
> guess this isn't so much of a problem with the other languages as they |
10 |
> don't have as many modules as are on the CPAN. I think we've discussed |
11 |
> all the issues. What do the gentoo team think we should do? Have lots |
12 |
> of ebuilds? Use CPAN.pm or CPANPLUS instead? Somewhere inbetween? |
13 |
|
14 |
I ran across BSDPAN a little while ago - like the CPAN module, but |
15 |
registers installed perl mods in the BSD PKG_DB |
16 |
|
17 |
Food for thought, perhaps: |
18 |
|
19 |
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1253580+1258568+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-ports/20010204.freebsd-ports |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
HTH, |
23 |
|
24 |
-b |