| 1 |
Will there be an alternative to inject? Sometimes (due to hardware |
| 2 |
issues) it is necessary to compile manually the sources. So after a |
| 3 |
make install, a simple emerge inject would do the work... |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:50:31 +0000, Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Friday 03 September 2004 5:46 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 8 |
> > On Friday 03 September 2004 10:55 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > Well, inject should never be used as a matter of course, so I don't |
| 10 |
> > > think this is a reasonable objection really... |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > inject is being removed in favor of package.provided (or some file |
| 13 |
> > similarly named) in /etc/portage/ so yes, i think we can ignore this |
| 14 |
> > objection -mike |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> inject is being removed entirely or just the current implementation? For |
| 17 |
> compatibility's sake, I'd hope that 'emerge inject' would at least append the |
| 18 |
> file to give the same effect... |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> Luke-Jr |
| 21 |
> Developer, Utopios |
| 22 |
> http://utopios.org/ |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Ioannis Aslanidis |
| 35 |
<deathwing00[at]forums.gentoo.org> 0xC2539DA3 |
| 36 |
<aioannis[at]tinet.org> 0xF202D067 |
| 37 |
<dwcommander[at]users.sourceforge.net> |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Hellenic Gentoo GNU/Linux project manager (http://hellenicgentoo.sf.net) |
| 40 |
FIRECOPS++ project manager (http://firecops.sf.net) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Computer Engineering student at Universitat Rovira i Virgili |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives