| 1 |
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:03 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Having a proper review workflow/platform increases the contribution |
| 4 |
> factor of the community. And not just that. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Define "contribution factor." If you mean the number of people |
| 7 |
writing patches vs the number of people with commit access, I'll |
| 8 |
agree. If you mean the absolute commit rate to the repository, I'd |
| 9 |
say that I have no reason to think that this is true. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'm also not going to give real-world examples of such workflows in big |
| 13 |
> projects: just head over to github. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
We already have the same workflow in Gentoo. Anybody can submit a |
| 17 |
pull request to the git mirror of the main tree. It will get reviewed |
| 18 |
and committed. We just don't exclude direct commits. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives