| 1 |
On 04/18/2015 02:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
>> |
| 3 |
>> I am really confused. I guess some people have never really been in a |
| 4 |
>> different workflow than gentoo to know that it's really not |
| 5 |
>> state-of-the-art. And it really isn't. Not even for distros. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I am not saying that a review workflow is bad. I just don't see how |
| 9 |
> it fixes our actual problems, which is a lack of commits in the first |
| 10 |
> place. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I think this should be so obvious by now given the past discussions |
| 14 |
(even in this very thread) that I'm not sure if I have to repeat myself. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Having a proper review workflow/platform increases the contribution |
| 17 |
factor of the community. And not just that. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm also not going to give real-world examples of such workflows in big |
| 20 |
projects: just head over to github. |
Archives