| 1 |
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 20:49, Maurice van der Pot wrote: |
| 2 |
> So I take it everybody who replied on this thread is in agreement that |
| 3 |
> the creation of an alias (e.g. maintainer-needed@g.o) would be |
| 4 |
> the best solution and that it is upto the herd to choose between |
| 5 |
> assigning the bug to the new alias and putting the herd on the cc and |
| 6 |
> the other way around? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Assigning to m-n@g.o and adding the actual fitting herd to CC is the most |
| 9 |
elegant option, IMHO. |
| 10 |
However we do it, we should really agree on one solution, to get more |
| 11 |
structure into the chaos. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> If this is introduced we need to record it somewhere. I'm not sure what |
| 14 |
> would be the best place though. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
- Topic of #gentoo-dev |
| 17 |
- -core mail |
| 18 |
- Developer Handbook (which really needs a section about how bugs are treated. |
| 19 |
I always wanted to write up a draft when I find the time...) |
| 20 |
- Announce the existence and purpose of the alias in the GWN |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
(o_ Markus Nigbur |
| 24 |
//\ Gentoo GNU/Linux Developer |
| 25 |
[ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org |
| 26 |
GPG Fingerprint: 9E31 187A 6C78 210C F248 EDBB F2FB A77F 707D F8C1 |
Archives