1 |
Travis Tilley wrote: [Mon Nov 08 2004, 01:45:19AM EST] |
2 |
> Brian Harring wrote: |
3 |
> >The env code I worked up for in bug #56408 is in portage cvs- among |
4 |
> >other things, the _only_ time the ebuild/eclasses are required for any |
5 |
> >package phase is setup. I'll be adjusting the code so that it's only |
6 |
> >required for setup when building, not for setup when installing from a |
7 |
> >package also, so eclasses from the tree are no longer used with binpkgs. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> errr... postinst/preinst????! I know the gcc ebuilds would be screwed in |
10 |
> regards to gcc-config switching without a few eclass functions... i dont |
11 |
> think i could make an incompatible change to those if i tried, but still. |
12 |
|
13 |
Brian was referring to the eclasses on disk, not the functions the |
14 |
eclasses provide. |
15 |
|
16 |
Regards, |
17 |
Aron |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Aron Griffis |
21 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |