| 1 |
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:05:53 +0100 |
| 2 |
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 17/01/2013 14:57, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 4 |
> > After some initial bikeshedding we came to the conclusion that |
| 5 |
> > naming the category simply "qt" is the most elegant solution. We |
| 6 |
> > will then also be dropping the qt- prefix in package names. This |
| 7 |
> > means x11-libs/qt-core will be moved to qt/core, and so on. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Please don't. Right now we have only one category which is not foo-bar |
| 10 |
> and that's virtual... I'm pretty sure it's going to break some |
| 11 |
> assumption to change that... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Which is a good thing, since it will force people to stop making |
| 14 |
incorrect assumptions. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives