| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 5 |
> I have seen many Perl virtuals go straight to stable and haven't ever |
| 6 |
> experienced any adverse effects. :) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
well, that's the idea :) But like I think it was Graham said in another |
| 9 |
subthread of this, perl team's virtuals only go to stable if both (in |
| 10 |
our case, there are usually only 2 possible sources for fulfillment) |
| 11 |
deps are already stable, so really all you're doing is updating a |
| 12 |
pointer reference. um. can i be more confusing? let's find out! |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>> /me hopes some arch brains step in, like weeve in particular, who is |
| 16 |
>> usually far more eloquent at defending an arch's position |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Oh sorry. :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
bah - that was me failing to finish the sentence that in my head |
| 21 |
concluded as "than me." That and softserve machines aside, weeve and |
| 22 |
gustovoz are pretty (in a positive sense) vocal about arch related |
| 23 |
items, so they were the ones that came to mind when i threw in the |
| 24 |
comment about arch's commenting. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Double bah. I think i've dug a good hole here. Let me get in it. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
- -- |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
| 31 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
| 32 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
| 33 |
Gentoo/SPARC |
| 34 |
Gentoo/AMD64 |
| 35 |
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E |
| 36 |
- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- |
| 37 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iD8DBQFGXvLHq1ztTp5/Ti4RAtf/AKCLWpCWcsD+m8njHSdfWltt+owQ1gCfaV2P |
| 41 |
S4o2MhHNJFs2gv2oN6yms/A= |
| 42 |
=sj0h |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives