| 1 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:35:08 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> said: |
| 5 |
> > Stabilization of Python 3.1.* will be requested at the beginning of november. |
| 6 |
> > There was a suggestion to create a news item which would inform users that |
| 7 |
> > temporarily they shouldn't switch to Python 3 as their main interpreter. |
| 8 |
> > Python ebuilds don't automatically activate Python 3, so I'm not sure if |
| 9 |
> > the news item is required. What is your opinion about it? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Please don't do this. The stable system is meant to "Just Work". We |
| 12 |
> don't need people switching between python versions and making half of |
| 13 |
> their system unusuable. There is absolutely no benefit to moving it to |
| 14 |
> stable. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I have to agree. It gains us nothing and creates an opportunity for |
| 17 |
disaster. Anyone wanting python-3.1 has the ability to unmask it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. |
| 22 |
gcc-porting, |
| 23 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives