| 1 |
> I'm very strongly against using Gentoo SoC time and resources for things |
| 2 |
> that are not officially part of Gentoo (yes, this statement could be |
| 3 |
> spun however you wish) or are not official Gentoo projects. And no, just |
| 4 |
> because a project has Gentoo developers in it doesn't mean that it's a |
| 5 |
> Gentoo project -- let's avoid the gray areas now, shall we? Just because |
| 6 |
> we have Gentoo devs who are also Gnome upstream doesn't make their |
| 7 |
> Gnome-related packages that happen to be in our tree official Gentoo |
| 8 |
> projects. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
In my opinion, any project that has reasonable potential to improve |
| 12 |
Gentoo as a whole *and* is strongly related to Gentoo should be |
| 13 |
considerable for SoC. While this is certainly not the case for say |
| 14 |
"Improving gtk+", it definitely is for Pepers project. After all, what |
| 15 |
is PMS all about, if we keep on evaluating package managers solely on |
| 16 |
being official Gentoo projects or not? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives