| 1 |
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:11:47 -0500 |
| 2 |
Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> If an ebuild meets the time criteria above and there are no technical |
| 4 |
> issues preventing stabilization, then the maintainer MAY choose to |
| 5 |
> delete an older version even if it is the most recent stable version |
| 6 |
> for a particular arch. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
...and as soon as they do, everyone gets hit by pages and pages of |
| 9 |
repoman output, and users get royally humped. Developers doing this |
| 10 |
is by far the most common cause for people getting hit by the repoman |
| 11 |
thing. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives