1 |
Ryan, |
2 |
|
3 |
I took a look at the problem cited in your bug report. I suggest |
4 |
compiling sys-boot/grub with CFLAGS="-O0 -ggdb3", attaching gdb to |
5 |
grub-install and then watching what happens in the debugger. If you |
6 |
compare runs with a GCC 4.5.3 built stage2 and a GCC 4.6.2 built |
7 |
stage2, you should be able to find the bug. |
8 |
|
9 |
Yours truly, |
10 |
Richard Yao |
11 |
|
12 |
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 |
14 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
15 |
> |
16 |
>> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are |
17 |
>> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near |
18 |
>> stabilization)? |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for |
21 |
>> testing purposes :-/ |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes |
24 |
> people's systems unbootable. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
> -- |
30 |
> fonts, gcc-porting |
31 |
> toolchain, wxwidgets |
32 |
> @ gentoo.org |