Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 02:31:54
Message-Id: 20060404022739.GD12047@dst.grantgoodyear.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct by Jon Portnoy
1 Jon Portnoy wrote: [Mon Apr 03 2006, 06:52:33PM CDT]
2 > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 07:35:52PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
3 > > Clearly this sentence states that Infra has usurped the suspension
4 > > process. It's very disappointing since Devrel has put so much work
5 > > into a process that has been demoted to "recommendation" status.
6 > >
7 >
8 > You mean the broken policy.xml everyone wants to replace?
9
10 That's rather unfair. Yes, you and many others want to replace it. I
11 think it is fair to say that many other people think it was a good, if
12 imperfect, start.
13
14 > I agree some of the wording should be altered, but I do think it's
15 > sensible for infra to cover when devrel falls on its rear.
16
17 Of course, it is possible that rational people might disagree that such
18 an event has happened here.
19
20 -g2boojum-
21 --
22 Grant Goodyear
23 Gentoo Developer
24 g2boojum@g.o
25 http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
26 GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>