1 |
Make out a bug and assign to me personally, and it'll be done. |
2 |
|
3 |
Kind regards, |
4 |
|
5 |
Karl T |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 03:03:33AM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote: |
9 |
> On Tuesday 22 June 2004 04:13 am, Guy Martin wrote: |
10 |
> > That's how I see it for most packages. The script I coded |
11 |
> > (http://dev.gentoo.org/~gmsoft/tools/imlate) checks stable version of |
12 |
> > a packages on a given arch against the stable version on another arch |
13 |
> > (x86 per default). |
14 |
> |
15 |
> dude that is -awesome-. i would love to see something like this in |
16 |
> gentoolkit-dev. :) |
17 |
> |
18 |
> i'd also like to see a better version of my revision checking script, which |
19 |
> will compare a currently installed ebuild with the version in portage and |
20 |
> tell you if they differ. i wrote it because i got annoyed while trying to fix |
21 |
> a package... apparently the bug was in a package it depended on. one that was |
22 |
> already fixed without revision bumping because the bug only effected amd64. |
23 |
> >_< but i have a -lot- more work to do on revcheck before it's generally |
24 |
> usable (and ignores changes we dont care about). |
25 |
> my initial version: http://dev.gentoo.org/~lv/revcheck.sh |
26 |
> the version ecatmur fixed up to have overlay support: |
27 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~lv/revcheck2.sh |
28 |
> |
29 |
> i'd love to know how many of these insanely useful tools are out there, just |
30 |
> not in general use. i know for sure imlate is going into my personal |
31 |
> toolbox. :) |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> -- |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Travis Tilley <lv@g.o> |
37 |
> |