| 1 |
Rich Freeman schrieb: |
| 2 |
> Double-standards aside, I don't think the "original" implementation is |
| 3 |
> what matters, so much as what works best for our users (and ourselves) |
| 4 |
> in practice. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I don't think the "original" matters either. But I wouldn't mind having |
| 7 |
libusb over libusbx, jpeg over libjpeg-turbo (did you notice any speed |
| 8 |
increase on your computer?), openoffice(-bin) over libreoffice. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Only if one implementation is vastly better than the alternative, then I |
| 11 |
would expect the distro to make the sane choice. Else it can be choosen |
| 12 |
randomly during each install for what I care. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Others have pointed out that we don't have enough data to safely |
| 15 |
> switch the default, and I think that alone is sufficient reason to |
| 16 |
> hold off for now, but once that data is collected if it makes sense to |
| 17 |
> switch we should do so. We don't use XFree86 or LILO, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Using LILO is still documented as an alternative to GRUB: |
| 20 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=10#doc_chap3 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives