1 |
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:25:07PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote |
2 |
> On 02/06/16 03:42 PM, waltdnes@××××××××.org wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:31:11AM -0400, Damien Levac wrote |
4 |
> >> |
5 |
> >> IMHO, you see this in reverse. the 'gui' useflag would be useful for |
6 |
> >> users who don't want to care about X/wayland/mir and do not want to care |
7 |
> >> about gtk/qt, they just want windows to be drawn for the applications |
8 |
> >> they install -- without, if possible, pulling useless dependencies. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > How, exactly, will the app draw windows without linking against one of |
11 |
> > X/wayland/mir/qt4/qt5/gtk2/gtk3/fltk or whatever else comes down the |
12 |
> > pike? |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> The "useless dependencies" is the result of one or more of these |
16 |
> random flags being enabled globally when an end-user just wants to |
17 |
> make sure they get the GUI built for their apps. |
18 |
|
19 |
The original discussion was about global defaults. If you want |
20 |
per-app settings, package.use is your friend. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
24 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |