Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

[Sebastian Pipping]

Markos Chandras wrote:
> Sebastian,
> 	Why would I want to do that? The license files should stay untouched. There is
> nothing wrong of having both licenses on ebuild since this is the upstream
> policy.

I forgot that the license files upstream might change
so I agree you need a copy downstream.

However, if the "End User License Agreement for
Open Source Software Development" document alone
doesn't say that

  1) "Perforce Software reserves the right to approve
      the Open Source license" (from [4]) and

  2) "Execution of a End User License Agreement [..]
      is required" (from [4])

(which at least I didn't find in the PDF) you will have
to add that somewhere somehow because people could
otherwise start using then software under that license
without being permitted to.

Also, please pay extra attention to the difference
between the terms "Open Source License" and
"Open Source End User License Agreement".  Thank you.



Sebastian