| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 16/06/16 09:39, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 5 |
> I guess what I mean is these outside developers could continue |
| 6 |
> hacking and/or breaking things, or whatever else, without worrying |
| 7 |
> about their "official" branch. We could have a standard that |
| 8 |
> assumes Gentoo pulls their 'master' branch and they keep other |
| 9 |
> stuff in 'dev', or some other model. We'll need to decide on *some* |
| 10 |
> branch, but putting it in writing would make things clearer for |
| 11 |
> prospective repo maintainers. |
| 12 |
OK, then I think that it would be a good idea to have a gentoo-ci |
| 13 |
branch, or similar, if the assumption is merely that this is where |
| 14 |
Gentoo developers will look when evaluating your repository. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
- -- |
| 17 |
Alexander |
| 18 |
bernalex@g.o |
| 19 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXYlpqAAoJENQqWdRUGk8B2G0P+wZ3Ol3AmhhsOFns7Jor7wJD |
| 24 |
d9wqlLqtTeMcMEfUfYunpD02KwepN0UFN8imIqOGIHBM4IgQsvq19ejDgguh/MK3 |
| 25 |
uQxuyLWEHMhVNBRjNz6Ngm0IPx/3XaCSJPSu0RZdkCkHcOmAHisQY0Vy4NZj3MdL |
| 26 |
JgBWSO5UA+CdOzC8t+TuyPE7+nt4fgC1sCwyPbjFMeD2A5IAtmyJ1hvW+THf0LeC |
| 27 |
BW3tKt3SVLvbRLFV1A4kpKQJ+geG6+6t24jeqYrKkcViTaL5YSoAPNfajmYobXyE |
| 28 |
zK7q+jN33WrwcOkUQGwWGg15D7/aGN5HzeJp6IGu6ANx+Ya+IVN/nG6ZpCdj569x |
| 29 |
eeIKvNsFC7KNE6IV0srXQHKZbz9W7cAadX/vxyWHRxOwsYRQ5ZrxJH+gq6V5yeOf |
| 30 |
0jHiT75xLCHkzk8jyKAFvou8YkLV4e9HnNd0R4Yub77hYUrS8kJ/XGRe2pEW9UrC |
| 31 |
eMli1kiEdJ4rwI+E62kPpPqSpm17MGsdylFNav/2j4EW7g8l/ez+7LT1kOSY8ywW |
| 32 |
JPSPiB53WHDDrnkn0y8Ips/sygu+8brTyu10SoNXSOHKZF2ZYUNXBOUunK3fqahb |
| 33 |
zxrnzIAu8e5BD97+YgxSbg284lleUqkSdZP5O7DaNEpSMcEo9yOv1kLYNsD1vGH/ |
| 34 |
mGYOXf0F5wti+uGJxjoH |
| 35 |
=bQST |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives