Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix?
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 09:24:22
Message-Id: 200705060521.50885.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? by Marius Mauch
1 On Sunday 06 May 2007, Marius Mauch wrote:
2 > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On Saturday 05 May 2007, Zac Medico wrote:
4 > > > Should we ban the _p0 suffix from the
5 > > > tree or should be change the version comparison behavior so that
6 > > > implicit _p0 is less than explicit _p0?
7 > >
8 > > 4 < 4_p < 4_p0 < 4_p1
9 > >
10 > > how that gets accomplished is up to you Zac ;)
11 >
12 > It's supposed to be 4 < 4_p == 4_p0 < 4_p1 now.
13
14 that also works for me in this case ... 4 < 4_p0 is what i was looking for
15 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature