Archives
Archives
| From: | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 06 May 2007 09:07:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070506105901.65379283@sheridan.genone.homeip.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 6 May 2007 04:37:10 -0400 |
| 2 | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > On Saturday 05 May 2007, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 | > > Should we ban the _p0 suffix from the |
| 6 | > > tree or should be change the version comparison behavior so that |
| 7 | > > implicit _p0 is less than explicit _p0? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > 4 < 4_p < 4_p0 < 4_p1 |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > how that gets accomplished is up to you Zac ;) |
| 12 | |
| 13 | It's supposed to be 4 < 4_p == 4_p0 < 4_p1 now. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Marius |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 19 | |
| 20 | In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 21 | Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? | "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o> |