Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 06 May 2007 08:39:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200705060437.10612.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On Saturday 05 May 2007, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | > Should we ban the _p0 suffix from the |
| 3 | > tree or should be change the version comparison behavior so that |
| 4 | > implicit _p0 is less than explicit _p0? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | 4 < 4_p < 4_p0 < 4_p1 |
| 7 | |
| 8 | how that gets accomplished is up to you Zac ;) |
| 9 | -mike |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should _p0 be allowed as a version suffix? | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |